What is actually Anyone finding very good precision with for 180gr pills and 4831? Just trying to find a place to begin so I do not squander a bunch of parts. Thanks for the help!
I might say you'd be far better off looking at if somebody could be ready to trade you some Varget in your H4831SC.
It really is probable that no further discussion is needed, by which situation we advise starting up a brand new thread. If on the other hand you really feel your reaction is needed you'll be able to continue to accomplish that.
I've experienced a few rifles that fouled truly negative. Receiving the many copper out was a true PIA until finally I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
some cartridges are inclined copper foul over Many others although, regardless of how sleek the finish is around the bore and have to have cleansing with the copper fouling much more often.
I do know, rough periods. H4831SC will certainly operate, I just failed to like the case density when loaded very long. I do not recall powder demand off the very best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that is wherever I normally intention to get. As part of your scenario utilizing what you might have (and what I ought to have completed) I'd start with the tip of your bearing floor in the bullet proper with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you finally locate a velocity node.
I don't like to operate up a load applying a person great deal of powder after which you can have to operate up once more simply because I operate out and also have to start out utilizing a new large amount range.
Like stated over, exact same stuff. Everything differs is the dimensions from the kernels. I did hear someplace that they're going to only make the SC Down the road. I have no idea if which is correct or not but would make sense to h4831sc me. I exploit SC mainly because that is definitely what I present in the 8 lb jug and it really works.
WA I would advocate a slower burner that should give far better scenario density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly when you're loading heavies prolonged.
The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they've slowed down the swift to show that their rifles are far better. It bug the hell from me. I do know greater. This is exactly why I don't ever throw out my older manuals. I do purchase new handbook continuously to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I take advantage of this 39grs in summers @ one hundred+ degrees without h4831 vs h4831sc any issues.
Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're absolutely distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 being substantially quicker as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Will not take care of them as exactly the same powder, as they most undoubtedly will not be.
It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC h4831 vs h4831sc to test. Found a node and shot some groups. I shot a .6 5 shot team these days. It truly is a little bit slower than H1000, but shoots great. Thanks for the recommendation, It is really great to realize that I have received alternatives when just one or one other powder is dried up.
Can I believe that H4831 can be substituted for H4831sc ? I do know the Actual physical distinction but will it influence the melt away or velocity? I think not but I'm not one hundred% absolutely sure.
I found that my 7mag a hundred and sixty partitions ended up sub MOA with 4831sc with lower to min expenses. I’m talking 2700 (it's possible 2800) fps, it absolutely was a lower 60s grain charge in a Norma scenario. Not what I used to be trying to find, but accurate Even so.